![]() ![]() Not only is everything properly labeled, the Microsoftian subtabs are gone. I find OmniOutliner 4’s inspectors much easier to use. ![]() I hated the gear-all it meant was “we don’t know how to categorize this stuff.” In OmniOutliner 3, settings were hidden behind subtabs whose purpose was hard to remember. The style inspectors are now much easier to work with. The zoom control allows the best of both worlds. Font sizes that were comfortably readable on screen came out childishly huge on paper or PDF sizes that looked good in print were unreadable on screen. It always displayed the outline with one pixel equaling one point, a poor choice when monitors commonly run at 120 dpi or greater. You can see it here near the left end of the toolbar.įor years, the lack of this simple control was what I hated most about OmniOutliner. The biggest improvement is the addition of a zoom control. And that’s where Omni’s made the most progress. To my mind, OmniOutliner’s functionality was never a concern it was its user interface that needed work. It’s the combination of these two, along with the improvements Omni’s made in version 4, that convinced me to stay with OmniOutliner. In these cases, the outline is the end product, not merely a means to an end, and the format of the output, especially when sent to a client, is important.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |